Get our 2025-26 Family Digital Wellness Guide with updated guidance on AI, social media & more.

Can AI Fix the “Male Loneliness Epidemic”?

four teen students walk away from a school together

Authored by Abbie Schwartz

Undergraduate Student Researcher with the Digital Wellness Lab


What is the “Male Loneliness Epidemic?”

The “male loneliness epidemic” refers to the growing concern that many boys and men are experiencing low levels of social connectedness. It is important to note, however, that “loneliness” itself is an internal emotional experience rather than simply the absence of social contact, and research consistently shows that women and men are reporting similar levels of loneliness, highlighting loneliness as an issue for both groups

That said, men tend to have fewer close friendships, and those friendships often lack the emotional intimacy and depth more common in female relationships. This gender gap in emotional support emerges early and has lasting consequences. Studies show that in early elementary ages, girls experience more sympathy for friends’ suffering than boys, and girls throughout grade school express more empathy than male peers. While 95% of teen girls say they have a close friend they can confide in, only 85% of boys report the same, and the majority of teens agree that “girls have it easier when it comes to having friends for emotional support.” With boys facing significantly higher suicide rates, promoting social connectedness is a crucial step toward prevention.

Masculinity and Friendships

Conformity to traditional masculine norms has been linked to poorer social functioning and worse mental health outcomes for men, with particularly harmful effects on mental health when those norms emphasize self-reliance. Cross-cultural research shows similar patterns among boys, where stronger endorsement of masculinity is associated with lower friendship quality. Additionally, negative peer experiences predict increased masculine behavior, highlighting the potential vulnerability for boys who are struggling socially to pick up ideologies that only further harm their social functioning. 

Media as a Mediator: The Manosphere

There is a pervasive online culture known as the “manosphere” that promotes alt-right ideologies and traditional masculinity; this content is also known as “red pill” or “alpha male” content. Research suggests that as many as 80% of teen boys aged 16-17 have been exposed to manosphere content, which can be particularly appealing during adolescence. These spaces frequently feature themes that resonate with boys, such as gym routines, sports cars, and tips for attracting women. However, this content can negatively affect teen boys’ relationships, as these traditional masculine norms emphasize social isolation and self-reliance. Young men who watch manosphere influencers are more likely to believe that “men should solve problems on their own” than young men who do not consume this content. They are also more likely to value wealth and popularity than kindness or trustworthiness in friends. Exposure to these messages may reinforce rigid masculine norms and reduce boys’ willingness or ability to engage in emotionally supportive friendships, exacerbating both social and mental health vulnerabilities.

AI as an Intervention

While researchers have yet to fully investigate whether AI could help promote healthy relationship skills among boys, one could reasonably theorize that boys who are heavily using AI chatbots as friends might have less social support than those who are not. Additionally, boys are known to externalize harm more than girls. This presents a unique opportunity to target interventions to boys who lack satisfying human connections.

AI has already successfully been used as a tool to teach social skills to children on the Autism spectrum, highlighting potential efficacy in other groups. Additionally, others have already suggested the idea of roleplaying scenarios with AI as a means to build social skills. AI models could be reprogrammed to promote social-emotional cognition and aid in fostering offline relationships. For example, if a user were to say something rude to a chatbot, what if the chatbot responded with “That was unkind, how would you feel if someone said that to you?” Or, if users self-disclose vulnerable information, AI could prompt them to “Ask a trusted friend what they think.”

Limitations and Future Steps

Manosphere content often promotes patriarchal ideals and violence towards women, particularly through teaching expectations in dating. However, this author believes it is unethical for minors to have romantic or sexual contact with non-peers, including AI, and therefore does not support AI dating interventions. If topics of this nature are mentioned to an AI bot, it should completely shut down the conversation and prompt minors to speak to a trusted adult.

Additionally, one must consider the fact that AI is prone to error. Unfortunately, this under-regulated technology has contributed to devastating mental health outcomes in vulnerable individuals, some of whom were minors. Consumers must continue to advocate for transparency and ethical considerations from companies in order to reduce harm.


The author of this article is a college student who has been engaging with the Digital Wellness Lab about topics of young people’s safety and wellbeing within digital environments. The opinions and ideas described here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions, research, or recommendations of the Digital Wellness Lab, Boston Children’s Hospital, or associates.


References

Bledsoe, I., & Smith, B. (2025, Aug 20). Male loneliness and isolation: What the data shows. American Institute for Boys and Men.. https://aibm.org/research/male-loneliness-and-isolation-what-the-data-shows/

Booth, R. (2025, August 27). Teen killed himself after ‘months of encouragement from ChatGPT’, lawsuit claims. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/27/chatgpt-scrutiny-family-teen-killed-himself-sue-open-ai

CDC. (2024, May 20). Risk and Protective Factors for Suicide. Suicide Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/risk-factors/index.html

CDC. (2017). QuickStats: Suicide Rates for Teens Aged 15–19 Years, by Sex — United States, 1975–2015. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66(30), 816. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6630a6

Fisher, K., Rice, S., & Seidler, Z. (2025). Young Men’s Health in a Digital World.. Melbourne, AUS: Movember Institute of Men’s Health. m https://us.movember.com/movember-institute/masculinities-report

Gilmour, J. (2025). Narrative Matters: Adolescence in The Manosphere – A perfect storm? Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 30(3), 320–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70012

Goddard I. & Parker, K. (2025, January 16). Men, Women and Social Connections. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2025/01/16/men-women-and-social-connections/

Gupta, T., Way, N., McGill, R. K., Hughes, D., Santos, C., Jia, Y., Yoshikawa, H., Chen, X., & Deng, H. (2013). Gender-Typed Behaviors in Friendships and Well-Being: A Cross-Cultural Study of Chinese and American Boys. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00824.x

Heinrich, L. M., & Gullone, E. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(6), 695–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002

How to improve your social skills and build confidence with AI. (n.d.). Microsoft 365. Retrieved September 11, 2025, from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-life-hacks/everyday-ai/communication-skills/how-to-improve-social-skills-with-ai

Kovess-Masfety, V., Woodward, M. J., Keyes, K., Bitfoi, A., Carta, M. G., Koç, C., Lesinskiene, S., Mihova, Z., Otten, R., & Husky, M. (2021). Gender, the gender gap, and their interaction; analysis of relationships with children’s mental health problems. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 56(6), 1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01950-5

Luse, B., McBain, L., Romero, J., & Williams, V. (2025, February 17). The men’s loneliness epidemic might not exist. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2025/02/17/1263527043/its-been-a-minute-male-loneliness-epidemic-real

Lyu, Y., Liu, D., An, P., Tong, X., Zhang, H., Katsuragawa, K., & Zhao, J. (2024). EMooly: Supporting Autistic Children in Collaborative Social-Emotional Learning with Caregiver Participation through Interactive AI-infused and AR Activities. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable Ubiquitous Technology, 8(4), no. 203. https://doi.org/10.1145/3699738

Parker, K. & Hurst, K. (2025, March 13). The Gender Gap in Teen Experiences. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2025/03/13/the-gender-gap-in-teen-experiences/

Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98

Shawcroft, J., Rogers, A. A., & Nielson, M. G. (2024). Endorsement of Masculine-Typed Behaviors Decreases During Middle Adolescence: The Contextualizing Role of Peer Experiences for Adolescents Living in the United States. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53, 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01861-z

What is the manosphere and why should we care? (2025, May 15). UN Women – Headquarters. https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/explainer/what-is-the-manosphere-and-why-should-we-care

When AI Gets It Wrong: Addressing AI Hallucinations and Bias. (n.d.). MIT Sloan Teaching & Learning Technologies. Retrieved September 25, 2025, from https://mitsloanedtech.mit.edu/ai/basics/addressing-ai-hallucinations-and-bias/

Williams, D. G. (1985). Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 12(5), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288179

Wong, Y. J., Ho, M.-H. R., Wang, S.-Y., & Miller, I. S. K. (2017). Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000176